For ease of reference, I assume the math goes like this:
- Spend 1R (2ER) to remove 2 threat from 1 scheme..
- Spend 2R (3ER) to remove either 2 threat from 2 schemes (total of 4 threat) or 3 threat from 1 scheme.
- Spend 3R (4ER) to remove either 2 threat from 3 schemes (total of 6 threat) or 3 threat from 2 schemes (total of 6 threat).
- Spend 4R (5ER) to remove either 2 threat from 4 schemes (total of 8 threat) or 3 threat from 3 schemes (total of 9 threat).
- Spend 5R (6ER) to remove either 2 threat from 5 schemes (total of 10 threat) or 3 threat from 4 schemes (total of 12 threat).
If my math is correct, I'm unclear on how to evaluate this card. The efficiency (cost -to-threat removed) ratio doesn't seem stellar; however, the versatility of the card's cost and it's capability of thwarting any scheme (whereas Even the Odds can only thwart side schemes). I'm curious to hear what others will have to say.