So... is this X threat from 1 scheme, or 1 threat from X schemes, where X is the number of Web-Warriors? I can read it both ways and can't find a specific ruling to point to one or the other. I'm leaning towards 1 threat from X schemes, but.... shrugs?
Spider-Man
Pavitr Prabhakar
정의
동료
Web-Warrior.
Cost: 3.
Health: 3.
Attack: 1.
Thwart: 1.
Resource:
Response: After Spider-Man enters play, remove 1 threat from a scheme for each Web-Warrior card you control (including Spider-Man).
"Villains from Ham's future. Gigantic robots now. Worlds in the Web are becoming entangled."
Spider-Ham #13.
- Spider-Man Core Set #1
- Spider-Man: Miles Morales Sinister Motives #11
- Spider-Man: Hobie Brown Sinister Motives #17
- Spider-Man: Miles Morales Wasp #19
- Spider-Man: Otto Octavius SP//dr #22
- Spider-Man Sinister Motives #30
- Spider-Man: Peter Parker The Rise of Red Skull #45
- Spider-Man: Peter Parker Sinister Motives #49
Reviews
My take is X threat from 1 scheme. I don't have a ruling to base it on but maybe we can hive-mind it out in the comments if nobody else knows for sure
—
Stretch22
· 747
X threat from one scheme. They only used digits for the amount of threat and said "a scheme" which is what gives it away.
—
Bojkan9413
· 1
The answer is that “for each web-warrior card you control” you “remove 1 threat from a scheme.” This means that you remove 1 from any scheme for each web-warrior…in other words, X threat from among X schemes.
—
andyborehol
· 1
Per the rulebook , unless it says “for each, choose” it only affects a single scheme.
—
Doc7
· 8
i think this is a good side deck card for when you have friends that run things like Spiderman (peter parker/miles morales), Ghost Spider, Spiderham, SP//DR , etc causing you not being able to play your ally cards because a unique ally cant be played when Heros with the same name exist on the field (both as an ally and a player's hero card)
there is no image on the main site so i had to check what the artwork was: crazyjackalope.com